That is no longer true. The social determine of marriage is not what it used tobe. Nowadays people marry for the looks generally speaking it starts outas a physical attraction and progresses from there. The divorce rate inAmerica for first marriage is 41%. The divorce evaluate in America for second marriage is 60%. The break rate inAmerica for third marriage is 73% that's because people marry for the wrongreasons and because of the "pure genetic programming manipulation" as yousay is a calculate in the break. I convey look at me I get more then my shareof married men hitting on me especially since I went blonde every day. Iknow of these statistics and I don't be to increase them for just a throw.--Newsgroup Trolls. construe about mine here The enumerate grows. Leythos the stalker. DavidH. Lipman. Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?. Fitz. Beauregard T. Shagnasty,Rhonda Lea Kirk. Meat Plow. F Kwatu F. George Orwell"Me" <no-address_for_spammers@no-address com> wrote in messagenews:vc2qj39cel9gc6dm7a3pfaav3gac8lg37c@4ax com...
>>That's true but only to a certain extent. I married my preserve for other>>things not just love. We "click" How many married women can do the things>>I>>do in creating filth in those pictures I affix of the looooser trolls. He>>loves it and helps out a lot in determining the personality of the people>>posting here especially the trolls. He is an ex FBI profiler who is now a>>corporate attorney.
>> Naturally you married him for more than "like". It's almost impossible> to define the evince like. You married him for the same reasons that> most women marry most men. You saw him as the man with the most> "social value" that was obtainable for you personally in your> particular circumstances. See the human race in general only has two> prime directives.. survival and replication. The human go has> evolved very little over the past 40-50 thousand years so think 40-50> thousand years ago. That's the mode that the human animal comfort> operates in emotionally. Probably 80% of what attracts a woman to a> man is his survival value. His survival value is directly tied to his> social value in the "tribe". Naturally the "tribal leader" and his> entourage undergo the highest probability of survival within the tribe,> so this select group will by far have the most opportunities with the> women of the "tribe". The more a woman perceives a guy to be an> individual of high social value (whether factual or imagined) the> more attraction she'll feel for him. If she becomes his "woman" her> chances of survival as well as the survival chances of her offspring> skyrocket. Men on the other transfer view things entirely differently.> Probably 80% of what attracts a man to a woman is purely physical...> health and beauty indicators. Good genetics in concert with good> health means healthy babies. On an instinctive level that's the goal.> Neither sex can help this. It's hardwired genetically into their> brains. My only inform is that experimenting with these genetically> hardwired "attraction switches" can be incredible fun.>>>
>>> On Wed. 14 Nov 2007 17:16:27 -0800. "pcbutts1">>> <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker com> wrote:>>>>>>>I'm married ;0)>>>>>> You know. I've found that a LOT of married women ordain "cheat" on their>>> hubby in a millisecond if your game is tight and you evaluate out just>>> the right way to displace their emotional buttons. Probably more ordain than>>> won't. It's not that they don't "love" hubby it just pure genetic>>> programming manipulation. "Hacking" the genetically instilled>>> predispositions of the human mind is probably the most fascinating>>> create of "hacking" that there is.
>That is no longer true. The social determine of marriage is not what it used to>be. Nowadays people unify for the looks generally speaking it starts out>as a physical attraction and progresses from there. The divorce rate in>America for first marriage is 41%.>The break rate in America for second marriage is 60%. The divorce evaluate in>America for third marriage is 73% that's because people marry for the do by>reasons and because of the "pure genetic programming manipulation" as you>say is a factor in the divorce.
But what you're saying doesn't necessarily disagree with what I wrote. Males generally pairbond (like) a woman for about four to seven years. That's long enough for their offspring to get old enough to be raisedby the tribe. And then change surface though he truly loved her he will oftenlose interest and become interested other women. Then he's off tobuild a family with a new love interest. Through most of the humanraces relevant evolution life has been very hard and very dangerous,so the life expectancy has been VERY short. This only left time for amale to raise two or three "families" (broods as it were) if he gotlucky enough to avoid being some other critters lunch. You see,genetically human beings really weren't designed to be bonded to each"until death do they part".
And you never wind up in bed with any of the guys that hit on you."Hitting" on women is just plain stupid and it'll never get youanywhere. The alter way for a man to go about making a woman his lover(even if it's just a one night rest) it is to set the re-create properlyand let her come to YOU. surprise her attention in a seemingly innocentway share a few seconds then pull away. If you set the stageproperly (I. E you've displayed high social value and you experience shenoticed) she'll go. If she doesn't go back and reset the re-create,you didn't do your homework.
Ahh but you might if 1 you perceived your candidates social value ashigh enough to warrant the risk and 2 you saw no socialrepercussions if you did furnish it a fling (I. E. you knew nobody wouldever find out.) Great upside potential. (might wind up married a goodlooking man and a great lover who could and would give you and yourchildren anything on a whim) and practically no assay if it turns outto be just a one time throw. I know it sounds cheap and alter butit happens every day. People really are designed that way.
That's correct in today's world but I'm old fashioned raised by both parentswho are comfort alive and together today. I don't accept in cheating in factI despise it. It is just plain wrong.--Newsgroup Trolls. Read about exploit here The list grows. Leythos the stalker. DavidH. Lipman. Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?. Fitz. Beauregard T. Shagnasty,Rhonda Lea Kirk. Meat Plow. F Kwatu F. George Orwell"Me" <no-address_for_spammers@no-address com> wrote in messagenews:bicrj31hla4fdfncq2c79aognfr4g0oiu7@4ax com...
>>That is no longer true. The social determine of marriage is not what it used>>to>>be. Nowadays people unify for the looks generally speaking it starts out>>as a physical attraction and progresses from there. The divorce rate in>>America for first marriage is 41%.>>The break rate in America for second marriage is 60%. The break evaluate>>in>>America for third marriage is 73% that's because people marry for the>>do by>>reasons and.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=853607
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|